<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://vistapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Lobal</id>
	<title>VistApedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://vistapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Lobal"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://vistapedia.com/index.php/Special:Contributions/Lobal"/>
	<updated>2026-04-07T17:11:38Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.0</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://vistapedia.com/index.php?title=User:Lobal&amp;diff=10817</id>
		<title>User:Lobal</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://vistapedia.com/index.php?title=User:Lobal&amp;diff=10817"/>
		<updated>2006-04-06T03:52:14Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lobal: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I&#039;m Seeking information on comparing design principles of VistA to other open source healthcare software systems. I&#039;m developing taxonomy of open source HC software.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I&#039;ve been looking at the software engineering principles for the OpenEHR project in Australia based on the GEHR framework and I&#039;m wondering if similar documents on the VistA architecture principles are available. I&#039;m currently looking at the very high conceptual level of the systems - ex: how systems fit the healthcare domain, stakeholders, functions etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There were very interesting discussions of OpenEHR describing the use of &amp;quot;archetypes&amp;quot; for the design framework. Can anyone comment on the relationship, or lack thereof between this type of design thinking and VistA? &lt;br /&gt;
Any information would be greatly appreciated.&lt;br /&gt;
-Lorie&lt;br /&gt;
Links for the openEHR project follow:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here is a link to openEHR FAQ on archetypes: [http://www.openehr.org/FAQs/t_archetypes_FAQ.htm#mozTocId141822]&lt;br /&gt;
This document includes a discussion of &amp;quot;single level&amp;quot; methodologies(page 3-5) and an illustration of the archetype model meta architecture on page 14 :&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.openehr.org/publications/archetypes/archetypes_beale_oopsla_2002.pdf]&lt;br /&gt;
There is a full discussion of the archetypes principles (69 pages worth) here:[http://www.openehr.org/publications/archetypes/archetypes_beale_web_2000.pdf]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lobal</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://vistapedia.com/index.php?title=User:Lobal&amp;diff=4122</id>
		<title>User:Lobal</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://vistapedia.com/index.php?title=User:Lobal&amp;diff=4122"/>
		<updated>2006-04-05T23:37:30Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lobal: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Seeking information on comparing design principles of VistA to other open source healthcare software systems. I&#039;m developing taxonomy of open source HC software.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I&#039;ve been looking at the software engineering principles for the OpenEHR project in Autralia based on the GEHR framework and I&#039;m wondering if similar documents on the VistA architecture principles are available. I&#039;m currently looking at the very high conceptual level of the systems - ex: how systems fit the healthcare domain, stakeholders, functions etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There were very interesting discussions of OpenEHR describing the use of &amp;quot;archetypes&amp;quot; for the design framework. Can anyone comment on the relationship, or lack thereof between this type of design thinking and VistA? &lt;br /&gt;
Any information would be greatly appreciated.&lt;br /&gt;
-Lorie&lt;br /&gt;
Links for the openEHR project follow:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here is a link to openEHR FAQ on archetypes: [http://www.openehr.org/FAQs/t_archetypes_FAQ.htm#mozTocId141822]&lt;br /&gt;
This document includes a discussion of &amp;quot;single level&amp;quot; methodologies(page 3-5) and an illustration of the archetype model meta architecture on page 14 :&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.openehr.org/publications/archetypes/archetypes_beale_oopsla_2002.pdf]&lt;br /&gt;
There is a full discussion of the archetypes principles (69 pages worth) here:[http://www.openehr.org/publications/archetypes/archetypes_beale_web_2000.pdf]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lobal</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://vistapedia.com/index.php?title=User:Lobal&amp;diff=4117</id>
		<title>User:Lobal</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://vistapedia.com/index.php?title=User:Lobal&amp;diff=4117"/>
		<updated>2006-04-05T23:35:42Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lobal: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Seeking information on comparing design principles of VistA to other open source healthcare software systems. I&#039;m developing taxonomy of open source HC software.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I&#039;ve been looking at the software engineering principles for the OpenEHR project in Autralia based on the GEHR framework and I&#039;m wondering if similar documents on the VistA architecture principles are available. I&#039;m currently looking at the very high conceptual level of the systems - ex: how systems fit the healthcare domain, stakeholders, functions etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There were very interesting discussions of OpenEHR describing the use of &amp;quot;archetypes&amp;quot; for the design framework. Can anyone comment on the relationship, or lack thereof between this type of design thinking and VistA? &lt;br /&gt;
Any information would be greatly appreciated.&lt;br /&gt;
-Lorie&lt;br /&gt;
Links for the openEHR project follow:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here is a link to openEHR FAQ on archetypes: [http://www.openehr.org/FAQs/t_archetypes_FAQ.htm#mozTocId141822|archetypes]&lt;br /&gt;
This document includes a discussion of &amp;quot;single level&amp;quot; methodologies(page 3-5) and an illustration of the archetype model meta architecture on page 14 :&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.openehr.org/publications/archetypes/archetypes_beale_oopsla_2002.pdf|Beale_design]&lt;br /&gt;
There is a full discussion of the archetypes principles (69 pages worth) here:[http://www.openehr.org/publications/archetypes/archetypes_beale_web_2000.pdf|archetypes]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lobal</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>