DavidWhitten: DavidWhitten moved page Episode15 to Ignacio Valdes Implementation Log/Episode15

2020-11-13T04:37:28Z

DavidWhitten moved page Episode15 to Ignacio Valdes Implementation Log/Episode15

← Older revision	Revision as of 04:37, 13 November 2020
(No difference)

Ivaldes1 at 16:21, 9 September 2009

2009-09-09T16:21:03Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:21, 9 September 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
			First appeared here: http://groups.google.com/group/hardhats/browse_frm/thread/fe18b79ef82998a6/26e5d8153c79ac81?q=#26e5d8153c79ac81

	Further along the Road Less Traveled: Psychiatric patients frequently		Further along the Road Less Traveled: Psychiatric patients frequently
	have to sign consents for medication and other things. I am told that		have to sign consents for medication and other things. I am told that

Ivaldes1 at 16:20, 9 September 2009

2009-09-09T16:20:47Z

New page

Further along the Road Less Traveled: Psychiatric patients frequently
have to sign consents for medication and other things. I am told that
the VA uses only proprietary systems like iMedConsent(tm) for this. I
have no doubts that Intracare will not be able to afford this or have
the desire to gum up the works with proprietary stuff. After having
the why-o-why-did-the-VA-decide-on-proprietary reaction for this, Is
there another way? I hope this does not become a show-stopper...

-- IV

Reply to author Forward

You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

2. Matt King
View profile
More options Sep 23 2008, 3:01 pm
From: Matt King <flydo...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 13:01:10 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Tues, Sep 23 2008 3:01 pm
Subject: Re: Intracare Implementation Log Episode 15: Non-proprietary signature consenting of patients.
Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
We just scan in the consents.
m

On Sep 23, 9:34 am, "Ignacio Valdes" <ival...@hal-pc.org> wrote:

- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
> Further along the Road Less Traveled: Psychiatric patients frequently
> have to sign consents for medication and other things. I am told that
> the VA uses only proprietary systems like iMedConsent(tm) for this. I
> have no doubts that Intracare will not be able to afford this or have
> the desire to gum up the works with proprietary stuff. After having
> the why-o-why-did-the-VA-decide-on-proprietary reaction for this, Is
> there another way? I hope this does not become a show-stopper...

> -- IV

Reply to author Forward
Report spam
Reporting spam
Message reported
Rate this post: Text for clearing space

You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

3. I, Valdes
View profile
More options Sep 23 2008, 4:30 pm
From: "I, Valdes" <ival...@hal-pc.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 14:30:18 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Tues, Sep 23 2008 4:30 pm
Subject: Re: Intracare Implementation Log Episode 15: Non-proprietary signature consenting of patients.
Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original | Remove | Report this message | Find messages by this author
What is the sequence for scanning stuff? Does it go to an intermediate
neutral stage like a pdf before it goes into cprs or directly into
CPRS? We have a high-dollar Toshiba fax/scan/copier. I know this topic
has been around for years.

-- IV

On Sep 23, 3:01 pm, Matt King <flydo...@gmail.com> wrote:

- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
> We just scan in the consents.
> m

> On Sep 23, 9:34 am, "Ignacio Valdes" <ival...@hal-pc.org> wrote:

> > Further along the Road Less Traveled: Psychiatric patients frequently
> > have to sign consents for medication and other things. I am told that
> > the VA uses only proprietary systems like iMedConsent(tm) for this. I
> > have no doubts that Intracare will not be able to afford this or have
> > the desire to gum up the works with proprietary stuff. After having
> > the why-o-why-did-the-VA-decide-on-proprietary reaction for this, Is
> > there another way? I hope this does not become a show-stopper...

> > -- IV

Reply to author Forward

You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

4. Nancy Anthracite
View profile
More options Sep 23 2008, 4:36 pm
From: Nancy Anthracite <nanthrac...@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 17:36:21 -0400
Local: Tues, Sep 23 2008 4:36 pm
Subject: Re: [Hardhats] Re: Intracare Implementation Log Episode 15: Non-proprietary signature consenting of patients.
Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
You can install scanning quite easily and see for yourself. CPRS has an icon
indicating there is a scan and it is pulled from an image directory tree
which may be on a separate machine.

http://www.opensourcevista.net:8888/NancysVistAServer/Scanning/

On Tuesday 23 September 2008, I, Valdes wrote:

- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
> What is the sequence for scanning stuff? Does it go to an intermediate
> neutral stage like a pdf before it goes into cprs or directly into
> CPRS? We have a high-dollar Toshiba fax/scan/copier. I know this topic
> has been around for years.

> -- IV

> On Sep 23, 3:01 pm, Matt King <flydo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > We just scan in the consents.
> > m

> > On Sep 23, 9:34 am, "Ignacio Valdes" <ival...@hal-pc.org> wrote:
> > > Further along the Road Less Traveled: Psychiatric patients frequently
> > > have to sign consents for medication and other things. I am told that
> > > the VA uses only proprietary systems like iMedConsent(tm) for this. I
> > > have no doubts that Intracare will not be able to afford this or have
> > > the desire to gum up the works with proprietary stuff. After having
> > > the why-o-why-did-the-VA-decide-on-proprietary reaction for this, Is
> > > there another way? I hope this does not become a show-stopper...

> > > -- IV

--
Nancy Anthracite

Ignacio Valdes Implementation Log/Episode15 - Revision history

DavidWhitten: DavidWhitten moved page Episode15 to Ignacio Valdes Implementation Log/Episode15

Ivaldes1 at 16:21, 9 September 2009

Ivaldes1 at 16:20, 9 September 2009