Ignacio Valdes Implementation Log/Episode15

From VistApedia
(Redirected from Episode15)
Jump to: navigation, search

First appeared here: http://groups.google.com/group/hardhats/browse_frm/thread/fe18b79ef82998a6/26e5d8153c79ac81?q=#26e5d8153c79ac81

Further along the Road Less Traveled: Psychiatric patients frequently have to sign consents for medication and other things. I am told that the VA uses only proprietary systems like iMedConsent(tm) for this. I have no doubts that Intracare will not be able to afford this or have the desire to gum up the works with proprietary stuff. After having the why-o-why-did-the-VA-decide-on-proprietary reaction for this, Is there another way? I hope this does not become a show-stopper...

-- IV 

   Reply to author    Forward


You must Sign in before you can post messages. To post a message you must first join this group. Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting. You do not have the permission required to post.


2. Matt King View profile More options Sep 23 2008, 3:01 pm From: Matt King <flydo...@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 13:01:10 -0700 (PDT) Local: Tues, Sep 23 2008 3:01 pm Subject: Re: Intracare Implementation Log Episode 15: Non-proprietary signature consenting of patients. Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author We just scan in the consents. m

On Sep 23, 9:34 am, "Ignacio Valdes" <ival...@hal-pc.org> wrote:

- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - > Further along the Road Less Traveled: Psychiatric patients frequently > have to sign consents for medication and other things. I am told that > the VA uses only proprietary systems like iMedConsent(tm) for this. I > have no doubts that Intracare will not be able to afford this or have > the desire to gum up the works with proprietary stuff. After having > the why-o-why-did-the-VA-decide-on-proprietary reaction for this, Is > there another way? I hope this does not become a show-stopper...

> -- IV 


   Reply to author    Forward

Report spam Reporting spam Message reported 

   Rate this post: Text for clearing space


You must Sign in before you can post messages. To post a message you must first join this group. Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting. You do not have the permission required to post.


3. I, Valdes View profile More options Sep 23 2008, 4:30 pm From: "I, Valdes" <ival...@hal-pc.org> Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 14:30:18 -0700 (PDT) Local: Tues, Sep 23 2008 4:30 pm Subject: Re: Intracare Implementation Log Episode 15: Non-proprietary signature consenting of patients. Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original | Remove | Report this message | Find messages by this author What is the sequence for scanning stuff? Does it go to an intermediate neutral stage like a pdf before it goes into cprs or directly into CPRS? We have a high-dollar Toshiba fax/scan/copier. I know this topic has been around for years.

-- IV

On Sep 23, 3:01 pm, Matt King <flydo...@gmail.com> wrote:

- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - > We just scan in the consents. > m

> On Sep 23, 9:34 am, "Ignacio Valdes" <ival...@hal-pc.org> wrote:

> > Further along the Road Less Traveled: Psychiatric patients frequently > > have to sign consents for medication and other things. I am told that > > the VA uses only proprietary systems like iMedConsent(tm) for this. I > > have no doubts that Intracare will not be able to afford this or have > > the desire to gum up the works with proprietary stuff. After having > > the why-o-why-did-the-VA-decide-on-proprietary reaction for this, Is > > there another way? I hope this does not become a show-stopper...

> > -- IV 


   Reply to author    Forward


You must Sign in before you can post messages. To post a message you must first join this group. Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting. You do not have the permission required to post.


4. Nancy Anthracite View profile More options Sep 23 2008, 4:36 pm From: Nancy Anthracite <nanthrac...@verizon.net> Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 17:36:21 -0400 Local: Tues, Sep 23 2008 4:36 pm Subject: Re: [Hardhats] Re: Intracare Implementation Log Episode 15: Non-proprietary signature consenting of patients. Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author You can install scanning quite easily and see for yourself. CPRS has an icon indicating there is a scan and it is pulled from an image directory tree which may be on a separate machine.

http://www.opensourcevista.net:8888/NancysVistAServer/Scanning/

On Tuesday 23 September 2008, I, Valdes wrote:

- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - > What is the sequence for scanning stuff? Does it go to an intermediate > neutral stage like a pdf before it goes into cprs or directly into > CPRS? We have a high-dollar Toshiba fax/scan/copier. I know this topic > has been around for years.

> -- IV

> On Sep 23, 3:01 pm, Matt King <flydo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > We just scan in the consents. > > m

> > On Sep 23, 9:34 am, "Ignacio Valdes" <ival...@hal-pc.org> wrote: > > > Further along the Road Less Traveled: Psychiatric patients frequently > > > have to sign consents for medication and other things. I am told that > > > the VA uses only proprietary systems like iMedConsent(tm) for this. I > > > have no doubts that Intracare will not be able to afford this or have > > > the desire to gum up the works with proprietary stuff. After having > > > the why-o-why-did-the-VA-decide-on-proprietary reaction for this, Is > > > there another way? I hope this does not become a show-stopper...

> > > -- IV

-- Nancy Anthracite

Retrieved from "https://vistapedia.com/index.php?title=Ignacio_Valdes_Implementation_Log/Episode15&oldid=18519"